Skip to main content

aws_iam_inline_policy Resource

Use the aws_iam_inline_policy InSpec audit resource to test properties of a single inline AWS IAM Policy embedded with IAM User, IAM Group or IAM Role. For managed policies, use the aws_iam_policy resource.


This resource is available in the Chef InSpec AWS resource pack.

For information on configuring your AWS environment for Chef InSpec and creating an InSpec profile that uses the InSpec AWS resource pack, see the Chef InSpec documentation on the AWS cloud platform.


An aws_iam_inline_policy resource block identifies an inline policy by policy name and user/group/role by name

# Find an inline policy by name and role name
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should exist }
# Find an inline policy by name and group name
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(group_name: 'group-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should exist }
# Find an inline policy by name and user name
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(user_name: 'user-a', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should exist }


This resource requires policy_name and one of the role_name, group_name or user_name to be provided.

See AWS Documentation on inline policies for more details


Returns the default version of the policy document after decoding as a Ruby hash. This hash contains the policy statements and is useful for performing checks that cannot be expressed using higher-level matchers like have_statement.
Returns the number of statements present in the policy.


Test that a policy does exist.

describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should exist }

Examine the policy statements.

describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
**Verify that there is at least one statement allowing access to S3.**

  it { should have_statement(Action: 's3:PutObject', Effect: 'allow') }
**have_statement does not expand wildcards. If you want to verify.**
**they are absent, an explicit check is required.**

it { should_not have_statement(Action: 's3:*') }
**You can also check NotAction.**

it { should_not have_statement(NotAction: 'iam:*') }


For a full list of available matchers, see our Universal Matchers page.

This resource has the following special matchers.


The control will pass if the describe returns at least one result.

Use should_not to test the entity should not exist.

it { should exist }
it { should_not exist }


Examines the list of statements contained in the policy and passes if at least one of the statements matches. This matcher does not interpret the policy in a request authorization context, as AWS does when a request processed. Rather, have_statement examines the literal contents of the IAM policy, and reports on what is present (or absent, when used with should_not).

have_statement accepts the following criteria to search for matching statements. If any statement matches all the criteria, the test is successful. All criteria may be used as Titlecase (as in the AWS examples) or lowercase, string or symbol.

  • Action - Expresses the requested operation. Acceptable literal values are any AWS operation name, including the ‘*’ wildcard character. Action may also use a list of AWS operation names.
  • Effect - Expresses if the operation is permitted. Acceptable values are ‘Deny’ and ‘Allow’.
  • Sid - A user-provided string identifier for the statement.
  • Resource - Expresses the operation’s target. Acceptable values are ARNs, including the ‘*’ wildcard. Resource may also use a list of ARN values.

Please note the following about the behavior of have_statement:

  • Action, Sid, and Resource allow using a regular expression as the search critera instead of a string literal.
  • it does not support wildcard expansion; to check for a wildcard value, check for it explicitly. For example, if the policy includes a statement with "Action": "s3:*" and the test checks for Action: "s3:PutObject", the test will not match. You must write an additional test checking for the wildcard case.
  • it supports searching list values. For example, if a statement contains a list of 3 resources, and a have_statement test specifes one of those resources, it will match.
  • Action and Resource allow using a list of string literals or regular expressions in a test, in which case all must match on the same statement for the test to match. Order is ignored.
  • it does not support the [Principal]( or Conditional key, or any of NotAction, Not[Principal](, or NotResource.


# Verify there is no full-admin statement
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should_not have_statement('Effect' => 'Allow', 'Resource' => '*', 'Action' => '*')}
# Symbols and lowercase also allowed as criteria
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  # All 4 the same
  it { should_not have_statement('Effect' => 'Allow', 'Resource' => '*', 'Action' => '*')}
  it { should_not have_statement('effect' => 'Allow', 'resource' => '*', 'action' => '*')}
  it { should_not have_statement(Effect: 'Allow', Resource: '*', Action: '*')}
  it { should_not have_statement(effect: 'Allow', resource: '*', action: '*')}
# Verify bob is allowed to manage things on S3 buckets that start with bobs-stuff
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  it { should have_statement(Effect: 'Allow',
                             # Using the AWS wildcard - this must match exactly
                             Resource: 'arn:aws:s3:::bobs-stuff*',
                             # Specify a list of actions - all must match, no others, order isn't important
                             Action: ['s3:PutObject', 's3:GetObject', 's3:DeleteObject'])}
# Bob would make new buckets constantly if we let him.
it { should_not have_statement(Effect: 'Allow', Action: 's3:CreateBucket')}
it { should_not have_statement(Effect: 'Allow', Action: 's3:*')}
it { should_not have_statement(Effect: 'Allow', Action: '*')}
# An alternative to checking for wildcards is to specify the
# statements you expect, then restrict statement count
its('statement_count') { should cmp 1 }
# Use regular expressions to examine the policy
describe aws_iam_inline_policy(role_name: 'role-x', policy_name: 'policy-1') do
  # Check to see if anything mentions RDS at all.
  # This catches `rds:CreateDBinstance` and `rds:*`, but would not catch '*'.
  it { should_not have_statement(Action: /^rds:.+$/)}
# This policy should refer to both sally and kim's s3 buckets.
# This will only match if there is a statement that refers to both resources.
it { should have_statement(Resource: [/arn:aws:s3.+:sally/, /arn:aws:s3.+:kim/]) }
# The following also matches on a statement mentioning only one of them
it { should have_statement(Resource: /arn:aws:s3.+:(sally|kim)/) }

AWS Permissions

Your Principal will need the IAM:Client:GetUserPolicyResponse, IAM:Client:GetPolicyResponse, and IAM:Client:GetRolePolicyResponse actions set to allow.

You can find detailed documentation at Actions, Resources, and Condition Keys for Identity And Access Management.

Edit this page on GitHub

Thank you for your feedback!


Search Results